| |
Main
Date: 19 Dec 2006 11:11:35
From: roger
Subject: old chums?
|
is Wobbot still here?
what about Doug?
and Ozzie?
c'mon guys, give me a cuddle, I've missed ya... :-)
|
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 15:34:38
From: roger
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
Bag...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes we is.
Hello, Wobbot. Having identity issues AGAIN?
See how considerate I am? I remember you use some lousy newsreader
and require the original text to be part of the reply, or your head
spins and you topple over or something.
How are you? Still running around a reservoir and leading a life
of... well... I never quite understood of what your life comprised... ?
Don't email me. I have no intentions of opening *anything* from you.
I still remember your colourful 'the captain' emails.
One day the net police will scoop you up and carry you to a place of
safety. Until then, tell me how you've been. I could do with a
giggle.
manly hugs,
r.
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 15:28:01
From:
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
roger wrote:
> is Wobbot still here?
>
Oh my...the hairs on my buttocks are standing on end (very itchy) I,
us, we, have returned.
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 15:21:39
From:
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
roger wrote:
> Hey, Mark.
>
> Hmmm, well I'm NOT Wobbot if that's what you're implying.
Yes we is.
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 14:39:35
From: roger
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
hey, girl! why am I not surprised you're still here?
still doing silly things in the heat?
kisses,
r.
|
| | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 12:06:48
From: joe positive
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
On 19 Dec 2006 14:39:35 -0800, "roger" <rohunte@gmail.com > wrote:
>hey, girl! why am I not surprised you're still here?
>
>still doing silly things in the heat?
of course. Even more so than before.
nice to see you back.
Karen
live! vicariously!
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 16:57:03
From: joe positive
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
On 19 Dec 2006 11:11:35 -0800, "roger" <rohunte@gmail.com > wrote:
>is Wobbot still here?
>
>what about Doug?
>
>and Ozzie?
>
>c'mon guys, give me a cuddle, I've missed ya... :-)
whoohoo!
live! vicariously!
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 11:58:53
From: roger
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
Hey, Mark.
Hmmm, well I'm NOT Wobbot if that's what you're implying. Nor have I
returned as a troll, though I hope my acerbic wit will continue to
serve me well in such glorious company.
I think Lance was a troll, though maybe I'm doing him a disservice.
Maybe he was simply dumb?
What happened to Oz? Of all the people I trolled, I feel worst about
Oz. I think, at heart, he was a fine guy, though I think his ideas on
running verged on the insane. But I should have been kinder. Ah,
well, older and wiser, huh?
I think I vaguely remember you. You're a Brit, no? And rather
speedy? If I'm incorrect, just pretend I'm right. You've made me
feel welcome. Thanks :-)
|
| | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 16:13:45
From: Mark Hutchinson
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
roger said...
>Hmmm, well I'm NOT Wobbot if that's what you're implying.
Nah, everyone knows that you and Billy are identical twins,
separated at birth. I was just noting that there might be a
certain symmetry to the nearly simultaneous reappearance. No
offence intended.
>Nor have I returned as a troll, though I hope my acerbic wit will
>continue to serve me well in such glorious company.
As do I. It's gotten pretty thin around here. The Philistines
are firmly in control.
>I think Lance was a troll, though maybe I'm doing him a
>disservice.
I doubt it. He *is* a troll, but in the more refined sense of the
word. Since his postings are designed to outrage the
aforementioned Philistines, he is to be applauded (and supported).
He is the soul of this group.
>Maybe he was simply dumb?
If using "dumb" is your less than elegant way of saying
"unconventional" and "idiosyncratic", then I would agree.
>I think I vaguely remember you. You're a Brit, no? And rather
>speedy? If I'm incorrect, just pretend I'm right.
Will comply.
Although "speedy" can be a relative term. I just ran a kick-ass
5K in 34:40. Not sure if that qualifies. :-)
>You've made me feel welcome. Thanks :-)
Hope you stick around. As I said, it's gotten pretty thin around
here, so troll (or otherwise) away!
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 19:41:12
From: Mark Hutchinson
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
"roger" <rohunte@gmail.com > wrote
Hey Roger. You've been missed.
> is Wobbot still here?
On and off. Mostly off. But just posted today. What a coincidence.
> what about Doug?
Unfortunately, still here. ;-)
> and Ozzie?
Seems to be gone.
But I'm here. I'm a new guy. Began posting about a year ago when I
could no longer watch Lance getting ritually lynched by the group. I
think I have accomplished getting Lance a better treatment, but now I
pretty much have the entire group pissed off at me.
That's OK though, it was worth it. :-)
|
| | |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 20:53:21
From: Doug Freese
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
"Mark Hutchinson" <markh@goamil.com > wrote in message
news:Xns989E9561EFF58markhgoamilcom@216.77.188.18...
> But I'm here. I'm a new guy. Began posting about a year ago when I
> could no longer watch Lance getting ritually lynched by the group.
> think I have accomplished getting Lance a better treatment,
You did? You did so well he hasn't posted in weeks and come to think of
it you disappeared also. You two off planning a family.
> but now I pretty much have the entire group pissed off at me.
They are? Whew, your self importantance is off the charts. ;)
-DF
|
| |
Date: 19 Dec 2006 11:26:53
From: roger
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
And surely to god Ozzie is still here. Huh? Where are you Oz?
*peeks behind sofa*
|
| |
Date: 20 Dec 2006 20:48:15
From: Doug Freese
Subject: Re: old chums?
|
"roger" <rohunte@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:1166555495.691899.137900@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> is Wobbot still here?
>
> what about Doug?
I sure missed ya! Hugs and kisses..
-Doug
|
|
