| |
Main
Date: 08 May 2006 17:41:22
From:
Subject: Walking between running
|
when beginning running (did i say that right?) and ones endurance isnt quite there yet, is it necessary to run all laps consecutively or does it benefit at all to walk a few when one gets tired, then pick up with a ran lap (this is on a 1/4 mile track)? i'm trying to build up to 4 miles a day and i'm currently only able to do 3 consecutive miles before my legs begin to hurt. i can however walk a lap after that 3 miles and my heart rate has dropped significantly and my legs are fine to run another lap or two. doing this i could most likely run 4 or even 5 miles but is that really helping my endurance?
|
|
| |
Date: 09 May 2006 11:01:04
From: Miss Anne Thrope
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
Endurance isn't how far you can jog. Endurance is making it all the way through Mission Impossible III without slitting your own wrists.
|
| |
Date: 09 May 2006 03:24:28
From:
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
takmais@yahoo.com wrote: > when beginning running (did i say that right?) and ones endurance isnt > quite there yet, is it necessary to run all laps consecutively or does > it benefit at all to walk a few when one gets tired, then pick up with > a ran lap (this is on a 1/4 mile track)? i'm trying to build up to 4 > miles a day and i'm currently only able to do 3 consecutive miles > before my legs begin to hurt. i can however walk a lap after that 3 > miles and my heart rate has dropped significantly and my legs are fine > to run another lap or two. doing this i could most likely run 4 or > even 5 miles but is that really helping my endurance? Your legs are "supposed" to hurt! That's why it's called "endurance" - you have to be able to endure the pain!
|
| |
Date: 09 May 2006 07:31:40
From: Dot
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
takmais@yahoo.com wrote: > when beginning running (did i say that right?) and ones endurance isnt > quite there yet, is it necessary to run all laps consecutively or does > it benefit at all to walk a few when one gets tired, then pick up with > a ran lap (this is on a 1/4 mile track)? i'm trying to build up to 4 > miles a day and i'm currently only able to do 3 consecutive miles > before my legs begin to hurt. i can however walk a lap after that 3 > miles and my heart rate has dropped significantly and my legs are fine > to run another lap or two. doing this i could most likely run 4 or > even 5 miles but is that really helping my endurance? > Yes, it's ok to intersperse walking between running. The longer workout will help build your endurance and adapt your body to running. Over time, your walk breaks will shorten or be less frequent. As already mentioned, be sure to run at easy effort - conversational - be able to talk in complete sentences. If you can, you might want to consider running places besides a track, as the repetitiveness of it and the turns could cause a muscle tiredness that you might not experience on trails or roads. But if a track is what works for you, then by all means keep at it. Dot -- "Success is different things to different people" -Bernd Heinrich in Racing the Antelope
|
| |
Date: 09 May 2006 04:07:51
From: Donovan Rebbechi
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
On 2006-05-09, takmais@yahoo.com <takmais@yahoo.com > wrote: > when beginning running (did i say that right?) and ones endurance isnt > quite there yet, is it necessary to run all laps consecutively or does > it benefit at all to walk a few when one gets tired, then pick up with > a ran lap (this is on a 1/4 mile track)? i'm trying to build up to 4 > miles a day and i'm currently only able to do 3 consecutive miles > before my legs begin to hurt. i can however walk a lap after that 3 > miles and my heart rate has dropped significantly and my legs are fine > to run another lap or two. doing this i could most likely run 4 or > even 5 miles but is that really helping my endurance? Yeah, taking walk breaks is fine, more important to just get the distance in. But it's also a good idea to go really slowly, so you don't get as tired. If you're going any faster than 2:30 each lap, slow it down a bit. Cheers, -- Donovan Rebbechi http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/
|
| |
Date: 09 May 2006 17:13:52
From:
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
wow robert, thanks for the detailed reply. to answer a few questions, i'm 29 and aboug 156lbs, 5'9 ( i know you didnt ask that but i see people mention it on here alot). for about 3 years i ran 2 miles a day (this was over 2 years ago) so i assume i'm starting out all over again. for 2 years i did pretty much nothing. sometime in late march i started running again. i dont think i' ve been running regularly for more than a month. i know i've not been doing 3 miles for more than 2 weeks and yes i pretty much go every day. sometimes i cant make the full 3 miles but i dont do any other kind of excercise. i'd like to get some kind of run or walk in every day but i suppose if its hurting me to run eveyr day i shouldnt be doing it..
|
| | |
Date: 10 May 2006 17:34:06
From: Low Hertz
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
takmais@yahoo.com wrote: > wow robert, thanks for the detailed reply. to answer a few questions, > i'm 29 and aboug 156lbs, 5'9 ( i know you didnt ask that but i see > people mention it on here alot). for about 3 years i ran 2 miles a day > (this was over 2 years ago) so i assume i'm starting out all over > again. for 2 years i did pretty much nothing. sometime in late march > i started running again. i dont think i' ve been running regularly for > more than a month. i know i've not been doing 3 miles for more than 2 > weeks and yes i pretty much go every day. sometimes i cant make the > full 3 miles but i dont do any other kind of excercise. i'd like to > get some kind of run or walk in every day but i suppose if its hurting > me to run eveyr day i shouldnt be doing it.. > I remember my start in running actually was a Summer Prep program for Football. I couldn't run a 1/4 miles much less a mile. We started running 50 yard, walking 50 yards, till we ran a 1/4 walked a quarter. What joy when I finally ran my first mile. I played a semester of football, had fun, but never stopped running.
|
| | |
Date: 11 May 2006 11:24:02
From: Robert Grumbine
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
In article <1147220032.796661.139320@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com >, <takmais@yahoo.com > wrote: >wow robert, thanks for the detailed reply. to answer a few questions, >i'm 29 and aboug 156lbs, 5'9 ( i know you didnt ask that but i see >people mention it on here alot). for about 3 years i ran 2 miles a day >(this was over 2 years ago) so i assume i'm starting out all over >again. for 2 years i did pretty much nothing. sometime in late march >i started running again. i dont think i' ve been running regularly for >more than a month. i know i've not been doing 3 miles for more than 2 >weeks and yes i pretty much go every day. sometimes i cant make the >full 3 miles but i dont do any other kind of excercise. i'd like to >get some kind of run or walk in every day but i suppose if its hurting >me to run eveyr day i shouldnt be doing it.. Since you're a young guy, and aren't carrying a lot of weight, you can probably expect shorter rather than longer recovery from your workouts. Still, your description of how you're feeling sounds like you're not getting enough recovery with 24 hours between runs. 36-48 is the usual recommendation between hard runs, and for now those 3 miles are hard runs. Two ideas. One is to increase your recovery time to the 36 hours. But many people get out most regularly -- and this is the key to training -- if they go at the same time of day all the time. So the other is to walk a half hour on your recovery day. Irrespective of those, a key thing I'll remind (I think it's a reminder) you of is that you should be running at a conversational effort level. You should be able to say 'yes I'm still conversational' on one breath, easily. If you can't, time to walk, and when you restart running, back off the pace. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences
|
| |
Date: 09 May 2006 20:16:02
From: Robert Grumbine
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
In article <1147135282.788346.151140@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com >, <takmais@yahoo.com > wrote: >when beginning running (did i say that right?) and ones endurance isnt >quite there yet, is it necessary to run all laps consecutively or does >it benefit at all to walk a few when one gets tired, then pick up with >a ran lap (this is on a 1/4 mile track)? i'm trying to build up to 4 >miles a day and i'm currently only able to do 3 consecutive miles >before my legs begin to hurt. i can however walk a lap after that 3 >miles and my heart rate has dropped significantly and my legs are fine >to run another lap or two. doing this i could most likely run 4 or >even 5 miles but is that really helping my endurance? When I start beginning runners, which I take as starting from 30 minutes walking, I require (well, vigorously suggest -- in working with adults you don't 'require') that they mix walking and running on their way from a 30 minute walk to a 30 minute run. First day, I walk-run with them to place where they need to start on the 13 stages between 0 (30 minute walk) and 14 (30 minute run). Many start above 1, but few above 8. As long as your pulse is up, you're working on your endurance (aerobic capacity). Walking counts here. If you'll need to do some walking, it's better to do it before you have to. That is, you seem to feel that you could do 4 miles if you walked some. Your legs hurt (which, by the way, is a suggestion that the problem isn't the heart/lungs) around 3. So walk that lap after mile 2, when you're still feeling relatively strong and before you're forced in to it. Then finish off the 4 after the break. Or, more my preference as I dislike long walk periods, walk a quarter lap after each mile. Your legs hurting isn't a matter of your aerobic capacity, that is muscles and tendons, or ligaments and bones. Aerobic capacity shoots up early, reaching a first plateau at about 8-12 weeks. But the muscles will still be adapting for 3-6 months. Skeletal adaptation is 6-12 months. So ... while you have aerobic capability for the 3 miles ok, your muscles are telling you that 3 miles is plenty -- for now. If you're also doing those 3 miles every day, you're probably going too often (how old are you? what other exercise are you getting? how long have you been doing this daily 3 miles?). Your body needs time to recover and rebuild from the stress. That rebuilding is when the training actually occurs. Shorting yourself the recovery time is an effective route to injury and then no running. Lots more details and considerations, of course, which is why it's a good idea to find a running club and/or coach. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences
|
| |
Date: 10 May 2006 23:21:27
From: Tony S.
Subject: Re: Walking between running
|
<takmais@yahoo.com > wrote in message news:1147135282.788346.151140@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > when beginning running (did i say that right?) and ones endurance isnt > quite there yet, is it necessary to run all laps consecutively or does > it benefit at all to walk a few when one gets tired, then pick up with > a ran lap (this is on a 1/4 mile track)? i'm trying to build up to 4 > miles a day and i'm currently only able to do 3 consecutive miles > before my legs begin to hurt. i can however walk a lap after that 3 > miles and my heart rate has dropped significantly and my legs are fine > to run another lap or two. doing this i could most likely run 4 or > even 5 miles but is that really helping my endurance? Though others have given you good answers, I'll chip in my experience. I started using walk breaks when getting back into shape in the Spring 2 years ago. Some ultra-runners use regular walk breaks as a way to increase their long run time in training, and Jeff Galloway is well known for incorporating walk breaks into his marathon training programs. see: http://www.jeffgalloway.com/training/walk_breaks.html I still use walk breaks sometimes on an easy day when not fully recovered from a long run. I'll commonly do 2 mins running and then 30 seconds walking, or 2:15/:15, etc. This means 4 short walk breaks in a 10 minute block. Variations on this are easy once you get used to it, and it will let you run further, and/or run on tired legs without muscle damage. When done more frequently and short, they allow the muscles to refresh while still getting an aerobic workout. You could also run 4 mins and walk 1, but I prefer the shorter ones if my legs are still trashed from a race or long run. -Tony
|
|